|
Treaties of Tianjin, 1858 and 1860 Three views of the "Tianjin Treaty Temple" (Chinese: Haiguang si 海光寺 ). These very rare, and probably unique photographs, depict the exterior and the interior of the socalled Tianjin Treaty Temple, i.e. the site where the Tianjin Treaties of 1860 were signed. The temple, in fact a Buddhist temple by the Chinese Name Haiguang Si 海光寺 , or Ocean Radiance Temple, is located about one mile south of the Chinese city. It was constructed in 1706 and constituted a large compound of buildings. It is interesting to note that Buddhist temple on the outskirts of Tianjin was chosen for the signing of the treaties, and not an official building of the imperial government in the city itself. The temple no longer exists (it was destroyed around 1900 I was told), but the placename still does. The first two photographs (entitled Towards Tientsin Treaty Temple
and Treaty Temple Tientsin respectively) were very likely
taken in the early 1860s, while the third photograph depicting the interior
of the main hall was made around 1871 or 1872. The text of the Treaty of Peace, Friendship and Commerce, between Her Majesty and the Emperor of China, signed, in the English and Chinese languages, at Tientsin, June 26, 1858 [with ratifications exchanged at Peking, October 24, 1860] starts thus: "Her Majesty the Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain, and His Majesty the Emperor of China, being desirous to put an end to the existing misunderstandings between the two countries, and to place their relations on a more satisfactory footing in future, have resolved to proceed to a revision and improvement of the Treaties existing between them;..." The Treaty was signed by Lord Elgin, Earl Kincardine and Prince Kung, the 27 year old brother of the emperor Xianfeng, who himself had fled Beijing and had left negotiations to the younger Prince. Note: The text of
the Treaty between the United States of America and the Empire of China,
ratified June 28, 1858, can
be found here.
A manuscript logbook compiled by Midshipman Fairlie, with standard daily navigational and sailing entries, a record of onboard routines, and ship actions. Part of the training of midshipmen was to keep such a log, which was reviewed by a ship's officer. Fairlie lists British and international vessels encountered, and mentions significant military and diplomatic individuals in the convoy. The entries recording the actions of individual war ships and gun boats gives a sense of British naval power in the Far East during the Opium Wars. The Retribution was an early example of the gradual introduction of steam power in the Royal Navy. In open waters, the ship made way under sail; In shallow waters the ship proceeded under steam, with coal-fired boilers turning a paddle wheel. This hybrid system enabled large war ships to penetrate the Chinese interior by sailing up rivers like the Pei River near Tianjin (at high tide only) and the Yang tse Kiang. Of particular interest is the record of events from June 1858 to January 1859 when the Retribution was involved in the British and allied actions against the Taiping rebels at Nanking. An almost hourly record details the attack on the Taku (Dagu) Forts in Tianjin on November 20 th and 21 st ,1858. Other warships besides the Retribution, such as the Furious and Cruizer, and the gunboats Lee and Dove, engaged in heavy shelling of the Forts, and later were joined by Imperial junks. The forts were heavily damaged, the rebels retreated and the Taku cannons were transported back to England as war trophies.
A very detailed, cartographic account of the joint French-British military
operation in China in 1860. The fortifications at the mouth of the Beihe
river are the famous Taku Forts. Blue-White-Red rectangulars signal French
encampments and troops; solid red rectangulars point to British troops,
while yellow squares signify Chinese imperial forces (here called Camp
Tartar). The battle and the ensuing victory of the allied troops
led to the so-called second Treaty of Tientsin, which established the
opening of more coastal cities to British trade, including Tianjin itself.
That this expedition was heavily disputed at least in London can be highlighted
by observations made by none other than Karl Marx, who - always the domestic
economic aspects of international trade at the center of his attention
- writes the following on what was then called the New Chinese War: (Published Oct. 29, 1859 in the New York Daily Tribune). Expédition de Chine en 1860 - Atlas Dressé d'Après Les Documents Officiels; Dépôt de la Marine, France 1863.
|
|
|||||
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Contacts |
Credits |
Sitemap |
Sponsors
|
||||||